<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby on Rails&#8217; footprint on Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techblog.41concepts.com/2007/12/21/ruby-on-rails-footprint-on-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techblog.41concepts.com/2007/12/21/ruby-on-rails-footprint-on-microsoft/</link>
	<description>A software development blog from 41concepts</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://techblog.41concepts.com/2007/12/21/ruby-on-rails-footprint-on-microsoft/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.41concepts.com/2007/12/21/ruby-on-rails-footprint-on-microsoft/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Good post.  Looks the "the Eye" is unfortunately not distracted anymore (http://www.softiesonrails.com/2006/6/25/frodo-enters-mordor-and-the-eye-should-be-very-worried).

It will be eerie if/when IronRuby + MVC ASP.NET + Visual Studio = a new way to develop Ruby on Rails applications.  With the new FCGI implementation now available for IIS, deployment may become easier on Windows as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  Looks the &#8220;the Eye&#8221; is unfortunately not distracted anymore (http://www.softiesonrails.com/2006/6/25/frodo-enters-mordor-and-the-eye-should-be-very-worried).</p>
<p>It will be eerie if/when IronRuby + MVC ASP.NET + Visual Studio = a new way to develop Ruby on Rails applications.  With the new FCGI implementation now available for IIS, deployment may become easier on Windows as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dkastner</title>
		<link>http://techblog.41concepts.com/2007/12/21/ruby-on-rails-footprint-on-microsoft/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>dkastner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.41concepts.com/2007/12/21/ruby-on-rails-footprint-on-microsoft/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I think RoR has a lot to do with spurring MS on to jump on the MVC wagon but Java has supported MVC and some REST concepts with WebWork as well as ORMs such as Hibernate. If anything they're finally catching up with those projects. I think what C# lacks that makes RoR so compelling is Ruby's duck typing and simplicity. Also, they haven't yet released any sort of utilities like Rails' script helpers for creating MVC components.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think RoR has a lot to do with spurring MS on to jump on the MVC wagon but Java has supported MVC and some REST concepts with WebWork as well as ORMs such as Hibernate. If anything they&#8217;re finally catching up with those projects. I think what C# lacks that makes RoR so compelling is Ruby&#8217;s duck typing and simplicity. Also, they haven&#8217;t yet released any sort of utilities like Rails&#8217; script helpers for creating MVC components.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
